Couple Awarded $2.4 Million for Defective Chinese Drywall
Monday, June 21st, 2010From 2004 to 2006, during South Florida’s new home construction boom, homebuilders ran out of drywall. As a result, homebuilders had to import drywall from Chinese suppliers, who have been accused of using inferior ingredients, such as contaminated gypsum. When exposed to Florida humidity and ocean salt air during the trip overseas, the Chinese drywall reacts negatively, releasing compounds that can make people extremely ill.
On June 18, 2010, a Florida couple who fled their dream home because of foul-smelling, ruinous Chinese drywall was awarded $2.4 million in damages, in the nation’s first jury trial over the defective wallboard that could have legal ramifications for thousands of similar cases, according to a recent Associated Press news report.
The six-person jury ruled that plaintiffs should receive more than just the costs of gutting and renovating their home: they were also awarded damages for loss of enjoyment of the $1.6 million house and for the drywall stigma that might reduce its resale value.
The defendant, drywall distributor Banner Supply Co., is named in thousands of other lawsuits. Attorneys in those cases, as well as many others pending nationwide against other companies, will look to the plaintiff’s damage award as a guide for what kinds of damages they seek.
Defective, sulfur-emitting Chinese drywall has been linked to possible health problems along with a noxious odor, corrosion of wiring, plumbing, computers, plumbing and jewelry. The majority of the problems have arisen in Florida, Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana in homes built during the housing boom and some damaged during the busy 2005 hurricane season.
The plaintiff’s accused Banner of concealing knowledge it had as early as 2006 that Chinese drywall was defective, including recommendations from manufacturer Knauf Plasterboard Tianjian that the wallboards should not be used. Many of those details emerged in this trial after a confidential agreement between Banner and Knauf was unsealed.
During the trial, Banner acknowledged bearing some responsibility but fought against paying the Seifarts more than their direct expenses. Company attorneys said the drywall problem in 2006 was limited to a handful of homes in Florida out of some 2,700 built and that it took time for the extent of the damage to become clear.
The Miami case follows a Louisiana federal judge’s decision in April to award $2.6 million in damages to seven families in Virginia for bad Chinese drywall. In that case, the Chinese entities who were sued never responded in U.S. court, leaving in limbo how the damages might be collected.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has recommended removing any tainted drywall and affected wiring, fire alarm systems and gas pipes.
